The joined-up SEND workspace

Every need understood.
Every action connected.

SEN Toolkit brings concerns, evidence, assessment, pupil voice and support planning into one calm, accountable workflow—so professionals can spend less time piecing together records and more time improving outcomes.

↓ See how it works
Built for UK SEND practiceHuman decisions at every stageSecure by design
Support at a glance
LM
PUPIL PROFILELeila Morgan

Year 6 · SEN Support

Review on track
EVIDENCE REVIEWED
82%
Strong evidence picture
LATEST WELLBEING7/10Pupil check-in · today
SUPPORT PLANS32 showing progress
GRADUATED APPROACH
✓✓34

AssessPlanDoReview

→
PROFESSIONAL DECISIONReview communication and sensory evidence

Suggested from reviewed observations · awaiting SENCO decision

✓
Evidence connectedOriginal wording preserved
✦
SENAOfficial guidance, cited

One coherent picture

Good SEND practice is a cycle.
Your technology should be too.

From the first words of concern to the impact of provision, SEN Toolkit keeps evidence connected, decisions visible and the pupil at the centre.

01Notice

Capture concern in ordinary professional language.

→
02Understand

Review evidence and explore functional needs.

→
03Act

Choose assessment and measurable support.

→
04Learn

Review impact and strengthen the next cycle.

The platform

One pupil picture.
None of the guesswork.

SEN Toolkit connects the information professionals need without automating professional judgement. Every suggestion remains reviewable, every source remains visible and every decision remains human.

01

From natural language to reviewable evidence

Record what has been noticed in everyday language. A controlled two-stage process identifies grounded observations, preserves the original wording and presents candidates for a professional to accept, edit or dismiss.

  • Functional areas, not diagnostic labels
  • Verbatim evidence remains traceable
  • No empty or silently inferred pupil record
ORIGINAL OBSERVATION

“Needs repeated reassurance before joining a new activity.”

Candidate observationRequires reassurance when joining unfamiliar activities.
Emotional regulationSchool engagement
Accept   Edit   Dismiss
02
◎

Assessment in context

Standard ND prescreening and adaptive maths assessment sit alongside the pupil’s wider evidence—not in a disconnected tool.

03
↗

Support that can be measured

Create a clear provision plan, name the intended change and set the review date. Pupil voice and professional review stay connected to the outcome.

Visual transition planReview in 12 daysProgress against intended outcome
SSENASpecial Educational Needs Assistant
What should we consider before an annual review?
✦

Begin with the pupil’s progress towards agreed outcomes and gather views from the pupil, family and professionals… [1]

[1] SEND Code of Practice · GOV.UK
04

Meet SENA. Guidance with guardrails.

A tenant-specific SEND assistant grounded only in accepted national policy and each organisation’s approved documents.

  • Official sources with visible citations
  • School policy libraries remain tenant-isolated
  • Conversation history is private to each user
  • Restricted to SEND advice—not diagnosis

For SENCOs

More clarity.
Less chasing.

Bring the moving parts of SEND provision into one organised professional workspace. See what needs attention, what has been tried and whether it is making a measurable difference.

01A complete pupil narrativeConcerns, reviewed evidence, assessments, wellbeing and support in one chronology.
02Decisions that remain accountableAI suggests; professionals accept, edit, defer, complete or decline.
03Review dates that stay visibleActive plans, overdue reviews and next steps are surfaced without spreadsheet archaeology.
EvidencePupil voiceAssessmentSupport
CURRENT PUPIL PICTUREOne connected
professional record
↗

For Local Authorities

Consistent practice.
Stronger assurance.

Give settings a shared structure for evidence-led SEND practice while preserving the professional context of every pupil and the data boundary of every organisation.

01A consistent operating modelA common graduated-approach workflow from concern through review.
02Meaningful service insightReporting on demand, review timeliness, evidence and provision—not opaque AI scores.
03Governance built into the workflowRole controls, source provenance, audit events and strict tenant separation.
LAShared standardsProtected local records

Trust is a product feature

Designed for sensitive work.
Controlled at every layer.

⌁

Tenant separation

School policies, pupil records and retrieved content remain within the organisation they belong to.

◉

Human review

Candidate observations, suggested next steps and safeguarding signals require authorised professional action.

▤

Source provenance

Original wording is preserved. SENA answers identify the approved official or local policy source used.

⌾

Role-based access

Safeguarding records and organisation controls are restricted to the people authorised to use them.

◇

Private conversations

SENA history is specific to the signed-in user and cannot be seen by another user or tenant.

↺

Visible accountability

Reviews and key decisions create an audit trail that supports professional and organisational assurance.

A calmer way to coordinate SEND

See the whole child.
Strengthen every next step.

Book a tailored walkthrough for your school, trust or Local Authority.

Tailored to your setting

Book a SEN Toolkit walkthrough

Tell us a little about your role and organisation. The SEN Toolkit team will contact you to arrange a useful, focused conversation.

What we’ll coverConcern-to-review workflowSENA and controlled guidanceSchool or Local Authority priorities

Your details are used only to respond to this enquiry.